Part 1: Government
As warned, this is the first part in a series (I have 3 parts outlined thus far) on where we're at as a country in my opinion. This was originally just one post, but I kept expanding the concept and seeking clarity (as a good engineer does) and ended up with an outline to work from.
Of late, I have become increasingly frustrated by the continuous answer that government can solve our problems. Is that really what government is for?
The point of government is to provide structure for a civil society through the protection of basic (or natural) rights. Having grown up in the states, the Bill of Rights seems a reasonably fair start at a list of rights a government should protect. Other things that it seems reasonable for the government to provide is a fair and balanced system for the redress of grievances criminal and civil (Justice system), support of basic infrastructure (roads, sewer--see your local DPW), and a face to the world as a whole in foreign affairs including a military.
After those things, it's all gravy. Most of the institutions we now take for granted as part of government are relatively new even in our country; public education (1840's), income taxes (1913, 16th Amendment), social welfare (1930's) just to name a few. Most were outgrowths of movements started in local communities then states at the behest of the electorate to solve a pressing problem at the time.
Those things are alright I suppose, but detract from the ability to focus on the core mission of the government just like a focus on test scores seems to be hurting schools in the mission of educating students.
The government is not a tool for a minority or majority to force a given belief set on those who don't agree. There is a certain minimum standard that everyone can agree on defined as natural rights but that does not mean a complete belief set. What business does the government have in marriage? Or birth control? Or employment practices? So long as the practice of a person's beliefs is not harmful to others, physically or undeniably emotionally does the government need to be involved? In most cases, I don't think so. Besides that, in these areas, law becomes unenforceable without a police state to watch every move of the citizenry.
The other thing it is not is a replacement for responsibility on any level. Many of the problems we face today would be much less challenging if people took responsibility for what they do and were held to it. Violent video games made me kill that person. The gun dealer that sold me the gun made me able to shoot my lover. I'm on welfare because my education was poor. Balogna. All of those and many other lines we see in the news daily are failures of personal responsibility.
With those things in mind, the next post will relate to democracy in all its forms.